Move Set / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page Move Set.

move set page

GullFire 30 Jan 2011 10:44

The Young One wrote:

The weapons are more or less sorted by move set on the overview pages, the few that share move sets are; Axes, Hammers and small Straight Swords (apart from the 1-handed R2 attack).
What about also listing their attacks and 'combos' with some comments of pro's and con's, which weapon and attack has AoE, knockdown, hyperarmor etc?
I may have misunderstood what this page really is about ;)

I wanted a page to document the various move sets is all.

I'm thinking it might be better to have the generic weapon type move sets as a bunch of includes ( <include:axe-hammer-move-set> etc).
Edit: Going to try and use part page include instead of having so many seperate includes flapping about. Even if part page is a bit clunky.

We could add a move set section to the individual pages and also note combos and unique moves on those pages.
Be good to get all the move sets down on this page first I think.

Last edited on 04 Feb 2011 12:32 by GullFire Show more

Re: move set page

The Young One 30 Jan 2011 13:22

Should we also do shields? Bash and Parry :D They have some fun, but mostly useless moves, when right-handed or 2-handed.

Re: move set page

GullFire 30 Jan 2011 13:47

yeah, that would helpful I think. nice one.

part page include test

GullFire 04 Feb 2011 16:12

part page include test on the Battle Axe page.

Put the move set info above the upgrade info so as not to muck up the upgrade toc.
Ideally the moveset info would be at the bottom of the page I think, but without a toc that includes the entire page nobody would know it was there probably.
Have made the moveset collapsible as I do not want to push the upgrade info any further down the page.

Re: part page include test

The Young One 05 Feb 2011 13:17

Looks good, but what if we format it to show the specified part of the page, instead of listing all parts that will not be parsed?

This would be the same as the upgrade information on the Battle Axe page, which is included from the Battle Axe Data page (Stooge has made some per page comments there). And instead of naming them "part1", "part2", "part3", they could be named "axe_hammer" / "large_axe_hammer" / "dagger" etc. It should make it less confusing what move-set data is included.

• move set formatting example: (iftag needs to be set/changed for data to show on move-set page)

[!-------------DO NOT MODIFY THE 4 LINES BELOW-------------]
[!-- {$axe_hammer}
[[iftags datatable]]
 --]
[[/iftags]]
||~ **1 Handed** |||| ||
|| **R1 -- R1** || horizontal Swipe || ||
|| **R2 -- R2** || heavy overhead Chop > upwards Chop || ||
|| **Roll -- R1** || Uppercut || ||
|| **Backstep or Run -- R1** || fast running Chop || ||
|| **Forward + R1** || Push || ||
|| **L1** (left hand) || Guard || ||
|| **L2** (left hand) || vertical Chop || ||
{{}}
||~ **2 Handed** |||| ||
|| **R1 -- R1** || alternating vertical Swipe || Stunlock. Great for breaking guards.||
|| **R2 -- R2** || heavy horizontal Chop || ||
|| **Roll -- R1** || Uppercut || ||
|| **Backstep or Run -- R1** || heavy running overhead vertical Chop || ||
|| **Forward + R1** || heavy Push || ||
|| **L1** or **L2** || Guard || ||
[!----]

• weapon page formatting example:

[[include move_set |axe_hammer= --] ]]

http://demonssouls.wikidot.com/forum/t-233073/battle-axe-data
http://community.wikidot.com/howto:include-part-of-a-page-only

Last edited on 05 Feb 2011 13:22 by The Young One Show more

Re: part page include test

GullFire 05 Feb 2011 14:38

Yeah, the iftag style is superior in every way.
I knew there had to be a better way than the exclude everything else method.
I'll give it a try.
Cheers!